Feedback

Searching for 'troubles'

Forum matches (4) | View All Forum Results
1 matches view forum post #10840 view details for free font #11894 burnt letters, for sparse, cryptic displays
1 matches view forum post #4209 hey i have the same problem too... my file menu do not have the install new fonts command so i copied the ttf files into my windows/font folder but i cant see them in my applications like microsoft word, etc.. HELP!!!
1 matches view forum post #10844 I think that's Milton Glasers "Baby Teeth", where anyone has troubles finding a digital version of it. See this discussion: http://typophile.com/node/842 which leads to a cyrillic version here: http://www.paratype.com/pstore/default.asp?fcode=TM_BBT&letter=B and some substitutes I gathered here: http://www.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont/forum/viewthread.php?threadid=42172
2 matches view forum post #21761 Thank you for your help. I will let you know if I have any more troubles. Yes, what you noticed was intentional, all similar glyphs a,b,d,p,q have the the same amount of ascension above the x height and desension below the baseline. I just played with this feature & ran with it throughout the font. Yes, it was intended to be a part of it's unique identity. Truly an "experiment," as I refer to my dabbling in making fonts. But I agree, though I meticulously edited & designed this font, this feature gives it an undesirable uneven appearance at some weights/ styles /settings. I'm sure you are familiar with the round overshoot technique; rounded letters like the capital O should slightly larger than the average height of the other capitals to counter-act the fact that it's rounded shape gives it the allusion that it is smaller. I took this design rule and exaggerated it.(reason for describing that this "sweet" font "doesn't adhere to old rules") It is a unique characteristic, but had I not done this.... I'm sure Champagne & Limousines would be even more lovely. Also, Champagne & Limousines Bold adds an alternate look to normal, rather than emphasis. In bodies of text, there's not that much variation/contrast between the two (normal & bold). It's more like a "less light" version than a bold style. I recommend using Thick or Thick Bold in bodies of text where bold is needed. One other thing, I regret that '{' and '[' characters do not extend to the lowercase descenders only to the baseline. That is a mistake. I felt better about that when I saw GeosansLight does the same thing though! Anyways... thanks again!~Lauren
Related keywords (10)

No commercial matches

Free Fonts (1)

Forum - Complete Font List - Contact us
server #3 | | copyright © abstract fonts government of canada