1 matches
 Hello,
Does anybody know any Shark Font, or a font that has ANYTHING to do with Sharks ? Any help will be very very much appreciated.
Thank you very much
Eposhark
1 matches
Even more messy!! Just the Garamond after a termite attack. A design??????????????? No way.
1 matches
There is a crude thing around called 'THE FONT'. It has exactly the shape of what you are after. But ... after a termite attack.
1 matches
Lino fonts ... Is this a new attack of web newspeak? First type and typeface were replaced by font. And now? Linotype replaced by Linofont? Are we soon talking about Monofont too?
Brrr!
1 matches
each time a description of the change, there is always plenty to talk about around the world. they are not exempt. a statement usually are: "i have to change almost immediately versions, so do not expect me to date continue to attack ..
1 matches
What attitude? I wrote an inquiry with a simple request. It was intended to be humorous, and should have been taken that way. I need one letter out of this font, and considering that I've purchased nearly 200 of them over the years, I would think that asking for a free one, (because the site has them!) would neither make me a "cheapskate" nor subject me to supercilious derision. Your own signature says "Relax... It is just a font" so what is the gigantically massive deal that someone asking for a free font is making everyone so grumpy, hateful, and demeaning? Give me a break. If a person asks for a piece of information, and one has it, then there is no reason whatsoever to withhold it, unless one is mean, petty, selfish, and hateful. If one doesn't have said information, then one should just say so without all the snark and personal attack. Sheesh...
1 matches
It is quite simple. You have your opinion - and the right to that opinion - and I have mine. I understand you consider a deformation of an existing typeface a new design, a new typeface, OK. I don't. To me a design is a new creation. Not something that borrows something, reshapes it with some filters and then claims it to be original.
Understand me well my friend, my point is not so much the reshaping - deforming - distorting someting existing. That is quite usual nowadays. My point is that one should not claim the design ownership and claim it is something new if it could not have been made without using an existing design - in this case the Garamond.
And again, if one does something like that to me it is not OK but, OK. Yet at least give the credits. If Chank just had mumbled something like "based on ..." he would have been fair and honest. Now only those that know about typography see that we have another case of borrowing.
So, respecting your opinion - like Voltaire told us to - I still don't consider this a font design. I still consider it a shamefull deformation of the Garamond.
And, indeed, this happens all the time. Your example like the fraktur after a termite attack is only one of many. May I shout MANY? My opinion about those is the same. Cheap effordless copying with a messy result.
That said, welcome aboard. Members with an outspoken opinion are more than welcome. Otherwise we just end up with "what is this". Nevertheless don't let's get to much preoccupied with this, after all, ... it is just a font ... right? There are things happening in this world we are living in that are much more worth to worry about. Agree?
|
Related keywords (10)
|
